Institutional Ownership, Cost of Capital, and Corporate Investment
نویسنده
چکیده
Neoclassical models postulate that firms’ investment is determined by expected profitability and the cost of capital. Capital market imperfections, caused by information asymmetries and agency costs, lead to a modified investment scenario, where the external cost of capital is higher than the cost of internal funds. This, in turn, leads to the well-known result of underinvestment by firms. We hypothesize in this study that institutional investors alleviate some of the capital market frictions by their relatively efficient information processing and managerial monitoring activities, thereby mitigating the underinvestment problem. In support of this hypothesis, we provide evidence indicating that: (1) The size of institutional ownership in public companies is positively related to the rate of investment in fixed assets, corporate acquisitions, and R&D; (2) institutions that trade frequently attempting to exploit short-term mispricings are more effective in reducing information asymmetries and enhancing corporate investment than other institutions; and (3) institutional investors eliminate the documented mispricing of securities associated with business investments. Taken together, these findings suggest that institutional investors alleviate market imperfections, thereby mitigating the underinvestment problem.
منابع مشابه
Foreign Portfolio Investment and Corporate Innovation
We investigate whether foreign institutional ownership impacts corporate innovation. Using firm-level data from 30 countries in 2001-2010, we find that higher foreign institutional ownership is associated with more investment in R&D and patents. Using the exogenous increase in foreign institutional holdings that follows a firm’s addition to the Morgan Stanley Capital International World Index, ...
متن کاملThe Impact of Institutional Ownership on the Relationship between Tax and Capital Structure
One of the reasons that companies avoid paying their taxes is that they choose to use debts for their funding. In other words, tax saving, an activity of companies to avoid taxpaying, can be used to finance corporate projects. Furthermore, since institutional owners are more inclined to supervise, they may shrink managerial behaviors to avoid taxpaying. In this study, institutional owners’ supe...
متن کاملTax Avoidance and Institutional Ownership: Active vs. Passive Ownership
Income tax is one of the most important costs of companies and it is usually considered as a cost that should not be paid. One of the most noticeable and influential factors in tax avoidance is corporate ownership structure. With an emphasis on institutional ownership and its types in this paper, it is attempted to measure the effect of this ownership and its types on corporate tax avoidance. F...
متن کاملCorporate Governance , Capital Market Discipline and the Returns on Investment
Corporate Governance, Capital Market Discipline and the Returns on Investment* by Klaus Gugler, Dennis C. Mueller and B. Burcin Yurtoglu We analyze the impact of corporate governance institutions, ownership structures and external capital market constraints on company returns on investment by using a sample of more than 19,000 companies from 61 countries across the world. We show that (1) of th...
متن کاملAre Foreign Investors Locusts? The Long-Term Effects of Foreign Institutional Ownership
In this paper, we challenge the view that foreign investors lead firms to adopt a shortterm orientation and forgo long-term investment. Using a comprehensive sample of publicly listed firms in 30 countries over the 2001-2010 period, we find instead that greater foreign institutional ownership fosters long-term investment in tangible, intangible, and human capital. Foreign institutional presence...
متن کامل